Comments on: How Historical Linguistics demonstrates that Intelligent Design isn’t science http://www.joshuamacy.com/wordpress/2005/01/14/how-historical-linguistics-demonstrates-that-intelligent-design-isnt-science/ Between logomachy and logomancy . . . Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:02:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Foire aux idees (Marc Andre Belanger) http://www.joshuamacy.com/wordpress/2005/01/14/how-historical-linguistics-demonstrates-that-intelligent-design-isnt-science/comment-page-1/#comment-7509 Foire aux idees (Marc Andre Belanger) Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:34:37 +0000 /?p=70#comment-7509 <strong>Le 1 %</strong> Un récent billet sur Logomacy, intitulé "How Historical Linguistics demonstrates that Intelligent Design isn’t science", me rappelle mes années d'université. On y cite cet extrait de Historical Linguistics de R. L. Trask : our policy of ins... Le 1 %
Un récent billet sur Logomacy, intitulé “How Historical Linguistics demonstrates that Intelligent Design isn’t science”, me rappelle mes années d’université. On y cite cet extrait de Historical Linguistics de R. L. Trask :

our policy of ins…

]]> By: BlogLatin http://www.joshuamacy.com/wordpress/2005/01/14/how-historical-linguistics-demonstrates-that-intelligent-design-isnt-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1862 BlogLatin Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:33:54 +0000 /?p=70#comment-1862 <strong>Speaking of Rhotacization</strong> Haven't you always wondered why the imperfect active indicative of sum goes: eramer&#257muser&#257ser&#257tiseraterant Who hasn't? Well, the rhotacization of intervocalic /s/ is to blame. The stem used to be *es-1, which you can still see in the pres... Speaking of Rhotacization
Haven’t you always wondered why the imperfect active indicative of sum goes: eramerāmuserāserātiseraterant Who hasn’t? Well, the rhotacization of intervocalic /s/ is to blame. The stem used to be *es-1, which you can still see in the pres…

]]> By: Foire aux idees (Marc Andre Belanger) » Le 1 % http://www.joshuamacy.com/wordpress/2005/01/14/how-historical-linguistics-demonstrates-that-intelligent-design-isnt-science/comment-page-1/#comment-7508 Foire aux idees (Marc Andre Belanger) » Le 1 % Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=70#comment-7508 [...] Le 1 % Classé sous: Science Linguistque — mab @ 13 h 34 Un <a href="http://www.joshuamacy.com/wordpress/index.php?p=70">récent billet</a> sur Logomacy, intitulé “How Historical Linguistics demonstrates that Int [...] [...] Le 1 %
Classé sous: Science Linguistque — mab @ 13 h 34

Un récent billet sur Logomacy, intitulé “How Historical Linguistics demonstrates that Int [...]

]]>